首页> 外文OA文献 >Clinical accuracy for diagnosis of antiphospholipid syndrome in systemic lupus erythematosus:evaluation of 23 possible combinations of antiphospholipid antibody specificities
【2h】

Clinical accuracy for diagnosis of antiphospholipid syndrome in systemic lupus erythematosus:evaluation of 23 possible combinations of antiphospholipid antibody specificities

机译:诊断系统性红斑狼疮抗磷脂综合征的临床准确性:评估23种可能的抗磷脂抗体特异性组合

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Objectives: To evaluate the clinical accuracy of antiphospholipid antibody (aPL) specificities both individually and/or in combination, in a wide cohort of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) patients in an attempt to identify a panel of tests that may provide the best accuracy for diagnosing antiphospholipid syndrome (APS). Patients and Methods: This study included 230 patients (218 women, mean age 42.7 ± 11.9 years, mean disease duration 12.2 ± 8.7 years), all fulfilling the 1982 criteria for SLE. All patients were tested for lupus anticoagulant (LA), anti-cardiolipin (aCL), anti-β2glycoprotein I (anti-β2GPI), solid phase anti-prothrombin (aPT), anti-phosphatidylserine/prothrombin (aPS/PT), and anti-phosphatidylethanolamine (aPE) antibodies. Sensitivity, specificity and predictive values were calculated. The diagnostic accuracy for each combination of tests was assessed by ROC and their area under the curve analysis as well as by the Youden’s index (YI). Results: Testing for six aPL derived 23 possible combinations of results. Among them, LA + anti-β2GPI + aPS/PT had the best diagnostic accuracy for APS as a whole and individually for both thrombosis and pregnancy loss (AUC 0.712, OR 3.73 [95% CI 1.82–5.38], P = 0.0001, YI = 0.32 and AUC 0.709, OR 3.75 [95% CI 2.13–6.62], P = 0.0001, YI = 0.37 and AUC 0.677, OR 4.82 [95% CI 2.17–10.72], P = 0.0007, YI = 0.38, respectively) and the best specificity when compared with all the other obtainable combination of tests. Triple positivity for LA + anti-β2GPI + aPS/PT was more strongly associated with clinical events (thrombosis and/or PL) when compared with double or single positivity (OR 23.2 [95% CI 2.57–46.2] vs. OR 7.3 [95% CI 2.21–25.97], OR 5.7 [95% CI 2.12–17.01] or OR 3.11 [95% CI 1.56–7.8] for single positivity for LA, aPS/PT and anti-β2GPI, respectively). Conclusions: Combining LA, anti-β2GPI and aPS/PT improves the diagnostic power and helps in stratifying the risk for each patient, according to their aPL profile.
机译:目的:在广泛的系统性红斑狼疮(SLE)患者群体中评估抗磷脂抗体(aPL)特异性的临床准确性,无论是单独的还是联合使用的,以试图确定一组可能提供最佳准确性的测试诊断抗磷脂综合症(APS)。患者和方法:本研究纳入230位患者(218名女性,平均年龄42.7±11.9岁,平均疾病持续时间12.2±8.7岁),均符合1982年SLE的标准。所有患者均接受了狼疮抗凝(LA),抗心磷脂(aCL),抗β2糖蛋白I(抗β2GPI),固相抗凝血酶原(aPT),抗磷脂酰丝氨酸/凝血酶原(aPS / PT)和抗-磷脂酰乙醇胺(aPE)抗体。计算敏感性,特异性和预测值。通过ROC及其曲线分析下的面积以及Youden指数(YI)评估了每种测试组合的诊断准确性。结果:six对六个aPL进行测试,得出23种可能的结果组合。其中,LA +抗β2GPI+ aPS / PT对APS的整体诊断和对血栓形成和妊娠流失的诊断准确性最高(AUC 0.712,OR 3.73 [95%CI 1.82-5.38],P = 0.0001,YI = 0.32和AUC 0.709,或3.75 [95%CI 2.13–6.62],P = 0.0001,YI = 0.37和AUC 0.677,或4.82 [95%CI 2.17-10.72],P = 0.0007,YI = 0.38)和与其他所有可获得的测试组合相比,具有最佳的特异性。与双阳性或单阳性相比,LA +抗β2GPI+ aPS / PT的三阳性与临床事件(血栓形成和/或PL)的相关性更强(OR 23.2 [95%CI 2.57-46.2] vs. OR 7.3 [95]相对于LA,aPS / PT和抗β2GPI的单阳性,分别为%CI 2.21–25.97],OR 5.7 [95%CI 2.12–17.01]或OR 3.11 [95%CI 1.56–7.8]。结论:根据他们的aPL资料,将LA,抗β2GPI和aPS / PT结合使用可提高诊断能力,并有助于将每个患者的风险分层。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号